The commercialization of HDPE began when Ziegler-Natta discovered the catalyst system that allowed the 
							   manufacture Polyethylene at lower pressures and temperatures, thereby permitting a polymer with fewer short chains. 
							   The introduction of the gas phase process by Union Carbide Corporation heralded a decade of new technology developments 
							   throughout the 1970�s, which saw the introduction of a number of solution, slurry and gas phase processes. In this period 
							   of rapid new developments, there were new bimodal technology introductions, which resulted in improvement of existing 
							   technologies, such as Basell�s Hostalen and Mitsui�s CX high density processes. The 1990�s saw the introduction of 
							   competing new bimodal technologies including Borealis� BORSTAR, Basell�s SPHERILENE, and Mitsui�s EVOLUE processes, 
							   as well as metallocene/single-site catalysts (for LLDPE production). The most recent development since 2000 has been 
							   the commercialization of Univation�s bimodal UNIPOL process, producing bimodal HDPE in one reactor.
							   A small number of technologies dominate the HDPE market.  Four technologies (Chevron Phillips, UNIPOL, Mitsui, and Hostalen) 
							   accounted for 70% of installed capacity in 2005.  With the addition of three more technologies (Solvay, gas phase INNOVENE, 
							   and Equistar-Maruzen), 85% of the global capacity is accounted for. The slurry loop and Ziegler slurry processes continue to 
							   dominate HDPE production, accounting for 68% of installed capacity. Gas phase plants that predominantly produce HDPE account 
							   for an additional 25% of capacity.
							   A major development thrust for HDPE has been into bimodal grades for high performance film, pressure pipe and to a lesser 
							   extent blow molding applications.  Pressure pipe producers are now pursuing the next pressure rating standard of PE125, 
							   with a number of producers well established in the PE100 category.  Currently, most commercial bimodal HDPE is produced 
							   in multiple reactor configurations, particularly dual reactor processes, which are optimal for the tailoring of resin 
							   structure. There is an increasing trend to bimodal products, where the combination of better processability without the 
							   loss of mechanical strength, permits downgauging, a reduction in product profile or thickness. For film, the same area of 
							   film can be made with lesser polymer, while for pressure pipes, reduced wall thickness reduces raw material requirements 
							   and makes more flexible pipe. However, conventional unimodal HDPE will maintain a significant market share. Bimodal HDPE 
							   is expected to maintain some price premium in the market, based upon a genuine performance advantage over unimodal material.
							Since the early 1990�s, metallocene/single-site catalyst developments have dominated advances in polyethylene technology, mainly 
							for LLDPE applications.  While traditional HDPE applications are not expected to see significant metallocene penetration in the 
							short-term, there are metallocene-based advances in HDPE.  The introduction of dual-site catalysts for the production of single 
							reactor bimodal HDPE may become a significant metallocene application, as dual-site catalyst research has typically focused on 
							at least one metallocene component in the catalyst system.
							The following are the most prevalent technologies for bimodal PE
							
								  
									|  |  | Unipol Prodigy | 
								   
									|  |  | Innovene PEs | 
	
									
									|  |  | Spherilene C | 
	
								   
									|  |  | Borstar | 
	
								  
									|  |  | Hostalen | 
	
								   
									|  |  | Chevron Phillips | 
	
								  
									|  |  | Equistar-Maruzen | 
	
								  
									|  |  | Mitsui CX | 
							  
							  The following technologies offer the conventional unimodal HDPE 
							  
								  
									|  |  | Unipol | 
								   
									|  |  | Spherilene | 
	
									
									|  |  | Innovene PEg | 
	
								   
									|  |  | Chevron Phillips | 
	
								  
									|  |  | Advance Sclairtech | 
	
							  
							  Global demand for HDPE in 2005 was 28.2 mln tons and has reached almost 31 mln tons in 2006.  Eastern/Central Europe, 
							  South America, Asia Pacific, the Middle East and Africa will have growth rates higher than the global average, 
							  with Asia Pacific having the highest growth in terms of volume.
							  HDPE demand by end use applications shows that blow moulding is the largest end use, accounting for 28% of total demand. 
							  Film represents the next largest segment with 26% market share. Other significant end uses are injection moulding at 19% and 
							  pipe and conduit 13%. This pattern is not expected to change significantly in the near future. HDPE global capacity in 2006 
							  was about 32 mln tpa, with 5.5% growth in capacities projected in the next 5 years. To meet this speculative demand growth, 
							  capacity additions will be required to address the supply/demand issues. HDPE production capacity profile will change 
							  significantly over the forecast period. North America and Western Europe are forecast to lose share in the global market, 
							  while Asia Pacific and the Middle East will increase their shares.
 							  
{{comment.DateTimeStampDisplay}}
{{comment.Comments}}