 |
 |
PVC products are cost effective polymeric material & have a long life span from minimum of 5 years to as high as 50 years. This is one of the prime reasons for its use in the building & construction industry. |
 |
 |
Fire resistance is required to be assessed in several aspects. First is ignition of the product. Ignition temperature of PVC is 390 degree C compared to 240-250 degree C of wood. PVC is therefore more difficult to get ignited compared to the standard wood that is very widely used in the building industry. Fire resistance of PVC product depends upon the amount of plasticizer. Higher level of plasticizer reduces resistance to fire. PVC corrugated sheet being mainly rigid, contains no plasticizer. Hence PVC corrugated sheet has high resistance to fire. PVC products including pipe, window profile, wire/cable & corrugated sheet are excellent in their resistance to fire. |
 |
 |
Another aspect that requires to be measured is the amount of oxygen in the environment that will initiate fire in a product. PVC containing more than 55% chlorine has excellent property. It requires 40% of oxygen when the atmospheric oxygen content is merely 21% at ambient temperature. At its ignition temperature, PVC requires 21% of oxygen. In other words, PVC will catch fire only at 250 degree C under normal atmospheric condition. |
 |
 |
When product catches fire it releases heat. PVC product generates 20000 KJ/ Kg, while the most widely used polyolefin product would release 46000 KJ/KG & gasoline would release 44000 KJ/KG. PVC is therefore superior in this aspect also. |
 |
 |
Once a product catches fire it could smoke. While polyolefin does not emit smoke, PVC is deficient in this aspect. PVC emits smoke. Specific optical density of gases arising from burning of PVC is 400 while wood typically has optical density of 550-600 depending upon type of wood. Special additives like zinc borate, aluminum hydroxide etc could reduce smoke density notably. PVC wire product is designed with such additives to control smoke density. |
 |
 |
During smoke generation, some toxic gases could also emerge. PVC on burning generally produces hydrochloric acid in the form of gas. This acid being corrosive could damage the plant equipment. It would also cause rusting of wall of an incinerator. This could reduce waste disposal of PVC after fire. Incinerator could be designed on stainless steel so that acidic hydrochloric acid would not corrode the wall of incinerator. However, this design would increase capital cost but on a long term when capital is amortized it contributes a very little amount higher than that for normal material of construction of incinerator. |
 |
 |
During smoke generation, toxic gases would also be emitted. PVC on burning typically generates hydrochloric acid, carbon monoxide & carbon dioxide. Water is also generated along with these 3 gases. Carbon dioxide is considered as low toxic material. L/D 50 value for carbon monoxide is 1300. Carbon monoxide & hydrochloride both are considered toxic Their L/D 50 values are 27 & 22 respectively. It is advisable to stay away from PVC fire, but if not possible then face should be covered by mask and should be accompanied by a respiratory system. |
 |
 |
In burning of PVC, along with the major portion of the above 3 gases, small amount of dioxin & furan. These are toxic. However their generation is actually very small. In fact, burning of wood generates more dioxin & furan compared to burning of PVC. The laboratory analysis conducted by Swedish authority found that only 1/1000 th amount was of both dioxin & furan was measured on a gram of PVC. L/D 50 value of dioxin is 0.025. |
 |
 |
In short, PVC is considered to be safe for use in building & construction industry. It can be safely said & concluded that PVC is not harmful & is comparable to timber product. Only precaution is required that face should be covered with mask to prevent from suffocation, nausea & fainting. |
 |
 |
PVC corrugated sheet is not compared to timber but is compared to asbestos or glass or fiberglass reinforced product since PVC corrugated sheet is an alternative to these 3 materials. Asbestos could cause cancer. It is therefore seen that asbestos corrugated sheet is phased out except in the developing & economically weaker regions. |
 |
 |
Glass is brittle compared to PVC corrugated sheet. Unbreakable glass would be equally expensive or even higher. PVC would be favoured on price. Fiberglass reinforced sheet also would be more expensive. |
{{comment.DateTimeStampDisplay}}
{{comment.Comments}}